Hi!
I have a problem with the latency between some parts of my patches - some of them are delayed by 64 samples (=block size). I think I've created some [r~]s before other [s~]s, which would lead to this behaviour. But: I don't know which objects are affected and I've got more than 50 [s~]s and [r~]s ;-)
The structure of the signal path is something like that:
main patch "mypatch": [pd PLAY] [pd DAC]
subpatch "PLAY": [play sig1] [play sig2] ... [play sigN]
abstraction "play.pd":
[readsf~]
|
|
[s~ $1]
subpatch "DAC":
[dac dac1] [dac dac2] ... [dac dacN]
| | |
| | |
[dac~ 1] [dac~ 2] [dac~ 3]
abstraction "dac.pd":
[r~ sigX]
|
|
[outlet~]
(playX will be set in real time to the necessary signal sigX)
Then, I want to start each of the readsf~ with different delays. To achieve that I use [1( with many [delay]s, with different delay values for each [readsf~]. Even if I quantize all delay values to the block size, I've got an additional delay of the block size on some channels, which only depends on the delay values and is not a jitter on DAC buffers!
Is it possible to determine the order of [s~] and [r~] having a look to the patch files?
I'd like to apply the suggestion of Miller to delete and recreate all [r~]s, but what I don't know is what should I do:
- recreate the single [r~] object in the abstraction "dac.pd" or
- recreate all "dac.pd "abstractions in the subpatch "DAC" or
- recreate the subpatch "DAC" itselft in the main patch or
- something else?
thanx in advance,
Piotr Majdak