On 05/26/2014 04:28 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 2014-05-26 09:35, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
void *tabPowSine_new(t_symbol *s, short argc, t_atom *argv)
short argc? why short?
this *must* be int (32bit!).
I see no good reason to use short here, either.
But I have to admit I am now curious-- what problem would it cause in this specific case? The number of args to the object will certainly be within the range of short, no?
-Jonathan
fgamsdr IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTgvsuAAoJELZQGcR/ejb4wHcP/jFL24R1nT6lh46fw04EycEw DDLP8vsElpyYkJ73cT9s5cjP+in9CayqxMB/GzMst0jOKByibSvrO8oRm7WmEdo8 7tWaF+ZClvAO8ksAbe8P4Ir9DxHH7lHMYhJJxfebgbUY9UFAcDUTqCFfEjUQYC64 Mb8P0a/duI9vXwmbVhAbx+DRFjh4qY60t+Jhan3EYlQBmi25Z1QnzzJdEHje0N2K fIqSArkOau4xKeah6hKPTcYukh/BTHGOtX8Zq1aEfmWjwhEYBmwpkaAwdY4dsAts 9TZIrmG+HGQKSusJN1cAPWb8WubwFzwh6VO4QGcaaf6ftmE6FLM0B0mimhnLkni3 lyT9pKNKl6zRDc85DY90PpCnuvQJlGTG5PYi698lC102rJsgHXz4pghCdK/X3v22 UjBPvGXUx4ScnFl1+6rwmnzS5Xdr8Aw54xFa+1D8E1UtANwNovi9C4KEP/XKPRri s+EIKnKuTMsc4+tUsuQdysm2SIZDvOxIsm3eI0+mEeu6g4KZZC8Bb+T7sA8BSZLp FpOo/5wEuI6RzvmKj5Syx5TRwfol4XzVBRYfyf15lmgi+IiXy3PAtTi7dPtBSGlL FGCSOxTrpoBWsieSEC7EXgKvQCC5o80QfBnxXmoJoeG7OjP7OF+fsfrZ+0GiDVeh j16bDOwyuxmgMYT28ld2 =Ag7/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list