[list of the table names( | | [r midi_note_number] | / | [set $1( | / [ ( |
If the essence of "seeing the light" regarding Pd Vanilla is that it's more efficient to use what's already there to read/write/share patches, I don't see why you'd prefer the abstraction to such a straightforward idiom to solve your task.
But my main point about Pet Rocks is that there are no operators for symbols in Pd Vanilla aside from measuring equality.
-Jonathan
----- Original Message -----
From: Frank Barknecht fbar@footils.org To: pd-list@iem.at Cc: Sent: Sunday, November 4, 2012 5:52 AM Subject: Re: [PD] Licensing issues (was rjdj is gone, robotcowboy is coming ...)
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 07:48:45PM -0700, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
That's a bit like having an abstraction to make an array of Pet Rocks. What do you use it for?
Everywhere you need to translate an index number into an arbitrary symbol. For example to translate midi note numbers to table-names in a generic sample player.
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list