8 Jun
2005
8 Jun
'05
6:19 p.m.
On Jun 8, 2005, at 7:52 AM, Miller Puckette wrote:
The "cos~" problem I should have anticipated... if we're in MacOSX, the code assumes big-endian... I think. Proably the __FreeBSD_ test could also include MAXOSX, assuming it defines the constants BYTE_ORDER and LITTLE_ENDIAN in a unix-ish way...
...yep, I checked for the __LITTLE_ENDIAN__ and it is defined, so we
should got with that kind of check...of course it also has the
expected __SSE__, __SSE2__, i386, __i386, blahblahblah...I still feel
strange seeing that on a mac :-) But it's certainly another
testament to the portability of pd!
jamie