Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On May 4, 2007, at 3:46 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
AFAIK it does not work yet - but it should not be that hard to implement ...
That does not work and would be a pain to implement.
why?
I think that there should just be a libdir called "gemabs" for those pd patches. If Gem was compiled as single-file-single-class, then this would "just work".
since Gem objects do share a lot of code, even splitting Gem into a lot of separate objects (which is planned on the long term) will still need a "core" which i would implement as a (very small) Gem.pd_linux
I think that the way that Thomas did it with flext makes a lot of sense. He made a flext.so and had the objects link to that DLL. That should work fine with Gem. It could be something like libgem.so/libgem.dylib/libgem.dll
this is just another option. still it does not answer the question "why does it not work and why would it be a pain to implement?"
ma. IOhannes