Hallo, Mathieu Bouchard hat gesagt: // Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Well, what do you want to do without [list length]? I say kill all the old versions of Pd.
Well, I included list length, so it will break on old Pd.
I don't follow Pd-extended and I don't remember when [list length] was introduced and when it got fixed to count meta messages as lists neither when settable sends were introduced and I didn't want to look it up so I just played it a tiny bit save - as save ay my educated guesses took me. Not safe. :)
Instead of always looking after Pd 0.39, Why not look after Pd 0.43 ? I think that the explanation for why [list-drip-quick] is the way it is, should serve as an example of things that could be changed in Vanilla or added to Vanilla... as long as you consider Vanilla to be the reference.
To me, Vanilla is the reference, but being a bit considerated of others didn't hurt here.
I use font size 10 and they don't overlap and never have.
Okay, I took a closer look and here (vanilla, Linux, 0.41) the objects that are next to each other share their right-left borders exactly. So you're right, they don't overlap, but again, as the various GUI changes of Pd-extended and probably those, that Miller is working on, lead to varying box sizes across versions and platforms, I prefer to have a bit more cushion around them in all [list]-abs.
Well, in any case where the highest speed is appreciated and order is not important, reverse dripping is faster than forward dripping, with today's pd.
Ah, good you remind me of that: I'll add a note to the help files.
Ciao
Frank