27 Aug
2008
27 Aug
'08
12:23 p.m.
On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 02:52 -0400, Enrique Erne wrote:
<snip> > the svn purepd patches contain some abstractions that confuse me a bit. > actually i would like to contribute to purepd. (i.e. why is there moses > and clip?)
Yes, me too! Maybe H-C intends it to be a 'turtles all the way down' Pd implementation?
maybe we should define a purepd styleguide too. the any_argument abstraction bothers me. i belive the patches could work without them and i would prefer to keep it super simple.
simple++
Jamie
--
www.postlude.co.uk
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jamiebullock