4 Jun
2003
4 Jun
'03
12:06 a.m.
hi, am i alone in finding GEM really not intuitive? it doesnt really have a "dataflow" feeling to it.
For example [cylinder] outputs an cylinder to graphics window,
but it isnt connected to the [gemwin] block.
What if i wanted to multiply the pixels of 2 different cylinders and
then output it to the graphics window?
Normally i would think:
[cylinder] [cylinder]
\ /
[pix_multiply]
|
[gemwin]
maybe it would be more fun if there was more a flow to it, like with pd sound. dont shoot me down if im wrong, it's just an impression :)