Oops.. the test patch is bogus. If [packOSC] wouldn't throw away the second message, the patch would trigger a stack overflow. Attached is a patch that wouldn't trigger any problems if [packOSC] would support reentrancy.
Roman
On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 13:54 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote:
Hi all
I noticed that [packOSC] does not support reentrancy (check attached patch).
Many object classes _do_ support reentrancy. At the same time it seems common in other environments not to support reentrancy. I wonder if this is considered bug. If so, I'll file a bug report.
Roman