On Mar 16, 2009, at 8:54 AM, Georg Holzmann wrote:
Derek Holzer schrieb:
My tendency is to keep everything as simple and low-tech as
possible. Does video conferencing add anything substantial that IRC
doesn't have already? Do we want to do interpretive dance for each
other in order to write a FLOSS manual? Do we really need to look
at another room full of people sitting behind laptops across the
ocean somewhere? Does anybody ever actually watch these video
streams from meetings like these? I could see some sense if there
was some sort of presentation aspect, but these will be working
sessions, i.e. very boring to look at .You are right. And if one really wants to speak/see each other, one can use ekiga,
skype or whatever ...
I find IRC meetings to be very unproductive. Everyone is usually too
busy multitasking to get anything done in the meeting. I think that
the high bandwidth of voice and seeing the person holds your attention
longer, so there is less multitasking and more focused discussion.
That said, if the audio connection is bad, then it gets worse than
IRC. IRC is good for asking pointed questions back and forth, better
than audio/video chat.
I think we should have IRC running, but also it would be great to have
video chat with projectors, speakers, and a decent mic setup. Marius
and I ran the streaming for a class at Brooklyn Poly. One student was
joining in from Canada. When it was set up and running well, it
actually worked quite well. This means spending a little time setting
up the speakers and mics, and a projector is good too instead of a
screen. Since this will be happening over three days, it makes sense
to spend some time on setup. ITP can provide all of the equipment on
the NYC end.
.hc
LG Georg
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Man has survived hitherto because he was too ignorant to know how to
realize his wishes. Now that he can realize them, he must either
change them, or perish. -William Carlos Williams