Hello Rory,
I am guessing that your machine will not be up to the task of doing anything serious with GEM. It is probably powerful enough to play with a few triangles, but will be fairly slow if you turn on texturing. The graphics card is _extremely_ important...probably more so than the CPU.
If you want any advice or recommendations, just let me know.
Later, Mark
============================ = mdanks@stormfront.com = Lead Programmer PS2 = http://www.danks.org/mark ============================
-----Original Message----- From: Rory Walsh [mailto:rorytheroar@yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 1:56 PM To: pd-list@iem.kug.ac.at Subject: Re: [PD] Where can I download Gem for Linux ( not a debian distribution)
I just downloaded the file today, I was not able to download it lastweek? the last day I tried before today was friday and I could not make the connection? Anyway I have step 1 of Gem for linux complete, I have the file successfully downloaded! Before I start downloading the prerequisites, is there a specific directory that i should install them in? Actually before I throw myself into this messy situation of trying to compile gem myself I have to ask is it worth it? I am running gem on windows with this machine(pentium II 32mb ram) and it is very slow, I am not even getting proper color although I suspect this has to do with my graphics card, I'm not sure what it is, it's just a standard one that came with the computer. I also run redhat on the same machine, but if the problem of performance is to do with a useless graphics card is there any point in trying to compile it for linux? Will the poor graphics card hinder the performance there also?
your gratefully, Rory.
Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie