On May 4, 2007, at 3:46 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
AFAIK it does not work yet - but it should not be that hard to implement ...
That does not work and would be a pain to implement.
why?
I think that there should just be a libdir called "gemabs" for
those pd patches. If Gem was compiled as single-file-single-class, then this would "just work".since Gem objects do share a lot of code, even splitting Gem into a
lot of separate objects (which is planned on the long term) will still
need a "core" which i would implement as a (very small) Gem.pd_linux
I think that the way that Thomas did it with flext makes a lot of
sense. He made a flext.so and had the objects link to that DLL.
That should work fine with Gem. It could be something like libgem.so/
libgem.dylib/libgem.dll
.hc
mfgasr IOhannes
Man has survived hitherto because he was too ignorant to know how to
realize his wishes. Now that he can realize them, he must either
change them, or perish. -William Carlos Williams