On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Andrew Brouse wrote:
You really shouldn't take my comments personally, they aren't meant to be at all. I do like you personally and respect the work that you do. My comments were meant to provide useful information to all those who are developing and working with Digital Video in Pd. For what it's worth, the references I pointed to are standard fare for all video engineers, whether on computers or not. I find it really sad the amount of bitterness, bickering, infighting and acrimony in parts of the Pd community.
I'm not taking your comments "personally". I'm trying to reply in a mostly technical way. If you write to pd-list you can expect that the standard fare for all video engineers could eventually be questioned, and just because it's standard doesn't mean it's holy.
The energy that goes into this is energy that doesn't go into making Pd and associated projects better tools. I find that really sad. That's all I have to say,
Are you sorry that I question subsampling? It sounds a lot like it to me! But I don't even know what you are referring to... the more general a complaint is, the less it can be meaningfully addressed. No, you really sound like you deplore that I question parts of colour theory, but you group it with random unspecified other mails of pd-list in order to __________. (fill in the blank)
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada