No, no reason other than that's what I had on my machine when I compiled it :) I should update to 0.92.3 and put up the new version. I'd also like to figure out how to compile this for Linux/Windows. Before Hans bothered to make a makefile, I was just throwing my source into GEM's pixes directory and recompiling GEM as a whole so it would be embedded in the main GEM binary. I'll see if I can change the makefile and get it going on my Linux machine later today. If you don't mind, I may have a couple questions for you off-list if I run into any trouble.
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 12:02 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
On 2010-05-19 22:53, William Brent wrote:
site? That one was built using GEM 0.92.2. If you haven't tried
is there any reason to use gem-0.92.2? minor releases only fix bugs, so 0.92.3 is (expteced to be) more stable than 0.92.2. to be precise, 0.92.3 fixed a memleak in the tracking code (pix_multiblob though) and a crasher bug.
ghmasdr IOhannes