I've heard that Celerons are weak in floating point performance; I've never tried one myself. Pd's audio computations are all done in floating point so on the whole Pd won't run fast on Celerons. However, I don't know any reason why the graphical side of things should be so bad. Perhaps this is a W98 thing which will go away with NT?
cheers Miller
On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 06:57:57PM +0100, Raffaele Turra wrote:
Hi everybody!
i'm still moving first steps in pd (yet reading manuals!!). By now it runs on a celly433, 128MB ram and win98 first ed. (but i'm installing WinNT) i notice that the system running PD is very slow in refreshing windows, at least slower than running other r/t audio softwares. Is it due to the architecture of pd (eg. audio computations made higher in hierarchy than graphical ones, or similar)?
Thx in advance
L?rd2??T3R