By the way, "Done with Pd" is a double entendre... maybe "made with Pd" would be a better name.
cheers Miller
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:54:59AM -0500, B. Bogart wrote:
Comments inline...
Frank Barknecht wrote:
This is exactly what I mean. Another motivation could be: if you're in the Workshop business, a collection of examples of what was done with Pd and it possible with it is very helpful to convince organizations to do a Pd workshop.
Great idea this would certainly be a good selling point for workshops.
Well, very true. However I think, such a project DB should not include smaller works like "I did a recording with pd, download it here: http://footils.org/some.ogg"
Or maybe it should include something like this, too, but the larger projects or works should be up front, IMO.
I understand your rational now. Anything that exists in the PD documentation should probably not be in there!
Hey, yeah: Ratings done by voting would be a good idea. Only pd.org members then are allowed to rate a project. Probably there already is a Plone module for something like this. [x] needs investigation.
Gets rid of the Jury problem and adds another level of community togetherness.
I remember something, remember something, ... but no, I forgot: What is ANN again?
Johannes, I can't find my link for this project, what was it called? The one that you used the artificial nerual network trained by the life's work of a composer?
The "project of the day" could just be a random grab from the top 10 of the voting list of projects.
B.