Dear Frank, List
thanks for that help! Yes indeed it works and i have been able of doing it with less objects and the help of bang~ as well. There is one thing i still don't get: I always thought pd would try to execute non-signal messages inbetween audio blocks. And for two messages this would be the same interval unless Pd had too many messages to calculate and defers them after the next audio block. But the writesf~ example shows that this is not necessarily the case.
Thanks again!
Peter
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Florian Hollerweger hat gesagt: // Florian Hollerweger wrote:
Is it possible to record 2 audio files with [writesf~] in a manner that the second starts "exactly after" the first one stops? In other words so that there will be a seamless (click-free) transisition when glueing the two together.
You have to make sure to activate the next [writesf~] on a block boundary and also close the first [writsf~] in that same block. See the [pd blockbang~] subpatch in the attachement for an example how to do it.
Ciao
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list