hi,
no, $0 has to be at the beginning of a name to work correctly. so it should be delwrite~ $0-xyz. $0 is substituted with a unique integer value. (i think starting with 1000, but thats unimportant). the thing is that a delayline cannot be named with a number but only with a symbol... so delwrite~ $0 would be extracted to delwrite~ 1099 and causes an error. if you have delwrite $0x, which is converted to 1099x that is a symbol and can be used (for sends, delays, ...)
marius.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Thurstan" thurstan666@hotmail.com To: pd-list@iem.kug.ac.at Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 7:12 PM Subject: Re: [PD] patch structure
So if I understand you well (I guess not) I have to use names like
[pd patch_one_of_six]
which contains
[delwrite~ delay1$0] [delwrite~ delay2$0]
and so on
and in subpatch two_of_six I'll have to use
[delwrite~ delay1$1] [delwrite~ delay2$1]
¿OR can I just name every object $0 and that's it? Looks a bit silly and unlogical to me so that will probably not be the case...?
Grtz Wilf
hi,
if you start building big patches you will find it useful to name every send/receive/array/delay/throw, ... with $0-names. $0 is expanded
patch-wide
with a unique number.
this looks a bit ugly, but is still less work than controlling all names
of
all of your patches.
marius.
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.at http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list