7 Jul
2015
7 Jul
'15
11:20 a.m.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 6:35 AM, Chris McCormick chris@mccormick.cx wrote:
Hello,
On 07/07/15 03:31, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Cyrille Henry <ch@chnry.net mailto:ch@chnry.net> wrote: look like it's more a s2i than a s2f True! Now it's real s2f
Having tried this strategy myself I discovered there are many pitfalls. The following are valid floating point representation that your abstraction will not parse:
-2.58934e+27
Covered!
I think there are also valid values like "-0.0" and "inf" that can come from floating point numbers rendered as strings and could cause some troubles.
Covered "inf", but not "-0.0", it will just output -0