Hi Jerome,If you're saying that your patches used to work and they now break, do file a bug about it. Others on the list have mentioned using [declare] for this purpose-- I never have but it's a reasonable use case.
-Jonathan
On Saturday, May 7, 2016 7:30 PM, Jérôme Abel <abel.jerome@free.fr> wrote:
Hi list,
With the new [declare] behavior, I am a little confused (Pd.0.47). I've read that putting [declare] in abstractions was not the "right" way, but that what I've done. Shame.
In La Malinette (malinette.info), it is very useful to have an abstraction named [include] which contains all relatives paths of all abstractions folders. The goal is to be user friendly and not ask people to add 6 paths in preferences ... And if I want to change a path, to add a common feature for all patches, I have just to change it once, all patches that have this abstraction are affected. And I want to add paths to my patchs I have just to remember the name of [include] to add this object and paths. These are benefits of having abstractions, like object-oriented programming.
How can avoid to copy/paste 100 times a subpatch which contains [declare] and all paths, in all my files ? Or may be there is a way to add dynamically paths on all patches or current patches ? I can't see [import] in Deken, may be it could be the right way to add this kind of feature ? Is it downloable ?
Thanks,
Jerome
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list