On 19.8.2012, at 12:15 , Pierre Massat wrote:
OK, it all makes sense, I just thought some list members might get tired of reading 100 messages about the RPi. But yes, it might just as well go back to normal in a few days (though in my case I seriously doubt it :) ).
in fact this can and does happen with any topic! For instance, I think I'll not have an application for libPD for the time being, but I wouldn't say 'never'. This happens everywhere and the traffic here is not particularly high, so far. ;-) YMMV of course.
2012/8/19 zmoelnig@iem.at
Quoting Michael Zacherl sdiy-mz01@blauwurf.info:
Although I'm subscribed to all Pd-lists I almost missed some interesting discussion on Pd-OT (hey Ed! ). I just had a look only because you mentioned that. Just out of an impulse I'd like to suggest to close this OT-list and simply follow the netiquette of proper tagging. another 2c, Michael. ;-)
i was thinking of simply redirecting all mails for pd-ot to "pd-list" with an added "[ot]" prefix. but then it didn't seem to be so important and i ended up doing more fun things.
fgmasdr IOhannes
-- nonconform? noiseconform: http://blauwurf.at http://soundcloud.com/noiseconformist