Ok, I've been doing alot of poking around and this is what I've found out. I have three seperate patches running simultaneously on the same machine. It appears that when I run only patch 1 and patch 2, everything's ok. Also, if I run patch 1 and patch 3, everything's ok. However, if I run patch 2 and patch 3, cpu use goes way up and it's not always the same. Sometimes, both patches show a huge increase in cpu use (about 18% each) and other times patch 2 remains the same but patch three uses about 50%.
And here's a new twist, I tried running them on another machine with an identical setup except it has a 600 mhz celeron instead of 400 (on the 'problem' machine) and everything was fine. They were all running at 0%.
Any ideas? Anyone?
best regards, Pall
----- Original Message ----- From: "Pall Thayer" pall@fa.is To: pd-list@iem.kug.ac.at Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 10:39 AM Subject: Re: [PD] cpu load question
What does your machine show when you do commandline top with the patch running?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Barknecht" fbar@footils.org To: pd-list@iem.kug.ac.at Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 1:53 AM Subject: Re: [PD] cpu load question
Hi, Pall Thayer hat gesagt: // Pall Thayer wrote:
Anyway, here's the evil cpu-eating patch. Yes it's a mess, it looks
like
it
wouldn't even patch a bike tire but hey, it does the job.
Okay, I found and installed mp3cast and flashserver now, but still nothing unusual in the patch. Strange.
ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.kug.ac.at http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.kug.ac.at http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list