Hi thanks Mathieu!
i just thought of the textfile idea a while after i posted. i use one textfile that when it's caught up with it's queue it deletes it's contents and starts over.
do you think there could be a memory leak in this patch??? i use it with a 2ms interval value...
Thanks again!
John.
----- Original Message ----
From: Mathieu Bouchard matju@artengine.ca To: saint saintidle@yahoo.com Cc: pd list pd-list@iem.at Sent: Saturday, 3 October, 2009 22:49:56 Subject: Re: [PD] List Message Queueing? ( Note on/off messages into vst~ )
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, saint wrote:
I'm looking for a way to send an object (or an external) a bunch of list
messages and for that object to then store them and output them at 2ms intervals in a sort of a queue.
if the messages are all of a fixed length and all made of floats, you could look into using several [pipe] at once.
But if ever you need your messages to be more free-form (variable length, mixed symbols) you may enjoy [textfile] even though you won't be writing to files, reading from files, converting to text, or from text. It's a misnomer really.
And because you can't delete the queue items that you are done with ([textfile] only supports deleting the whole contents), then I suppose it'd be better if you use a few counters, and use a second [textfile] so that once in a while, one of the [textfile]s only contains obsolete data, so that you can clear it, so that you don't make a memory-leak.
Using externals instead of internals, you could use a single [coll], that can delete single elements. In that case you save yourself the trouble of double-buffering, but afaik you still have to use counters.
if you want something even more automatic, I haven't looked into Holzmann's containers, but I assume that they offer a lot more than either [textfile] or [coll].
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: +1.514.383.3801