Hallo, Mathieu Bouchard hat gesagt: // Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
I don't know which of those two outputs should be the main one, but it should mirror a subsequent "unsplit" or "unslice" so that e.g.:
[list slice 2 2] | | [list unslice 2 2]
This no-op in Pd would be done as:
[list split] | | [list]
To keep this working using neg. indices would also require the tail being at the second outlet.
(Note: I tend to prefer sendign "3 4" to the first outlet, as it's technically easier,
I don't know. What's technically easier about it?
Actually it's no big deal: To keep the order of execution right to left, I just need to use an additional trigger and a [list] for intermediate storing.
Thanks to yours and IOhannes comments I see a bit clearer now and I decided to use the niagara way of splitting at negative indices.
I now did it that way. The abstraction is called [list-splat] (advanced list split) and is in SF-CVS or GOTO10-SVN at: http://royalrabbit.goto10.org/svn/goto10/pd-patches/fbar/list-abs/
It requires [list-rev] which has a little bug fixed.
Some more new [list]-abs: list-sieve, list-idx, list-equalize, list-normalize and, finally, list-abs. ;)
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__