how about naming the 'class' 'objectclass' instead?
although you are probably right, marius, that most of the pd users do not know the term 'class', they'd probably understand 'objectclass'.
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 15:07 -0400, marius schebella wrote:
as hans already knew, I disagree. I have not heard the term class before. I think the term class is really not in use by pd users. what you (hans) call a class is called an object by everybody else...
certainly not true, marius. i know some people who are using 'class' instead of 'object'. also i would prefer 'class', though i am not quite sure right now, what to use, that is why i sometimes use 'object'. and for consistency's sake: why not introducing something new to get more clearness and to avoid confusion beforehand? at least in my opinion the differentiation between a [dac~] and the 'dac~' in general is quite important.
roman
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de