Whoopsie! Didn't see the tilde there! I assume that [nop~] still exists. And I can see why [nop] wasn't the most popular object on the block. Cosmetic would be a good word for it ;-)
d.
derek holzer wrote:
Hi Roman, IOhannes,
me and friends of mine used [nop] sometimes just for cosmetical reasons.
More than "cosmetical", [nop~] is employed in the use of [limiter~] as a way of delaying the signal one sample block. This makes the new Zexy reverse-incompatible with its own help files for another object, as well as any patches out there using [limiter~] as the help files would suggest you to.
d.
Roman Haefeli wrote:
hi
me and friends of mine used [nop] sometimes just for cosmetical reasons. now i found out that it has been dropped from zexy. is there a reason to drop an object when it's already introduced? i mean, it's _not_ that difficult to change the patches, so it's not a big deal, but i think [nop] didn't "disturb" the library, or did it?