Make sure you run the most recent version of pdl2ork when you fire it up next.
There have been a lot of speedups since then.
-Jonathan
From: Billy Stiltner billy.stiltner@gmail.com To: Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com Cc: pd-list pd-list@iem.at Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 6:30 PM Subject: Re: [PD] GUI and DSP
I don't remember its been about a year or so since I ran it. Was the same thing that was slow with the other slow versions of pd I guess. Next time Ifire up the machine it's on I'll try to run it. I remember that max with juce on windows would drop out with the x.fm patch if I played a bunch of notes.with a 256b block pd would drop out with polyphony as well but I could run with a 64b block and GEM slinging polygons all over the place but the juce examples were slow. With a lot of overhead. I might not have had enough memory 1GB.
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Billy Stiltner billy.stiltner@gmail.com To: Mathieu Bouchard matju@artengine.ca Cc: Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com; "pd-list@iem.at List" pd-list@iem.at Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 4:03 AM
Subject: Re: [PD] GUI and DSP
When I tried JUCE on windows it was slow. pretty but slow. Same with pdlork on linux.
What was slow with pd-l2ork?
-Jonathan