Often, on MacOSX, when 'Pd-extended' quit, 'pd' stay. You have to
force 'pd' to quit then relauch 'Pd-extended' (if i'm right).
++
Jack
Le 8 mars 09 à 21:12, mark edward grimm a écrit :
oh... and PD does not quit. even if i hit "relaunch" or "ignore" or
even if i just try to quit in general....i have to "force quit"
and this has been like this for a little while on differnt
systems.. at least at the leopard level. not sure about tiger/ppc/ intel - not sure if that all made a difference....--- On Sun, 3/8/09, mark edward grimm mgrimm@syr.edu wrote:
From: mark edward grimm mgrimm@syr.edu Subject: Re: [PD] shell .... again.... To: reduzierer@yahoo.de Cc: "pd_list" pd-list@iem.at Date: Sunday, March 8, 2009, 4:07 PM
what are the symptoms of the crashes? does pd just quit with a segfault, or does [shell] makes pd hang?
yeah its really weird....
i get:
"the application pd quit unexpectedly"
then i can ignore or relaunch...
either choice PD still runs in the background. the "ignore" or "relaunch" seems to be only a nag screen that does not do anything... but at the same time creates the situation that make PD unusable...
anyone else with he same?
maybe its leopard thing?
--- On Sun, 3/8/09, Roman Haefeli reduzierer@yahoo.de wrote:
From: Roman Haefeli reduzierer@yahoo.de Subject: Re: [PD] shell .... again.... To: mgrimm@syr.edu Cc: "pd_list" pd-list@iem.at Date: Sunday, March 8, 2009, 3:02 PM On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 11:53 -0700, mark edward grimm
wrote:
i have been "trying" to use shell...
works
OK in linux but in osx it just crashes.
i am just wondering if this thread went anywhere:
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2009-01/067700.html
i have it in a bunch of patches now and would
love to
use it more ... if it had more cross-compatibility
(osx)
because i tend to work with others + other os's.
maybe i should just change to pdlua as frank
suggested? or might shell someday get fixed?
not sure what to do....
what are the symptoms of the crashes? does pd just
quit
with a segfault, or does [shell] makes pd hang?
it's been a while, since i used [shell] the last
time,
but i remember, that i could always make it work with what i wanted,
it was
just a matter of writing the script in a way, so that it immediately exits or detaches the running processes to the background.
commands,
that do not exit, will make [shell] block pd. all this only
applies, if
you experience hangs, but not segfaults, of course.
roman
Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie
zum
neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list