What's the point of advocating a proprietary operating system that does not even have good quality software?
can you give examples? I work with Pd, sibelius, reaper, ...
Other think is: do not talk about price when you talk about free software.... That's losing the point. I think free software should be of very good quality and people should be encouraged to pay for it if they make money of of it, or if they can contribute with something.
I never talked about price about free software, don't know where you got
that. Can you be more precise?
I think all software should be of good quality. When I spend X hours
trying to work with an OS and I get nothing done, that's a criteria for me
to leave that os and go to an other where I can produce something, not
just be solving problems all the time. but that's my decision.
Since you speak of contributing, you can go back read my e-mail. I've
given a donation to Hans for his work on Pd-ext (nothing fancy), and also
bought the hard disk where the windows builds on the compile farm are
stored. Besides that, I've spent lots of time helping with documentation
(go back to read my mail). So, we agree on this.