Thanks Ico, sounds good - will have a look. Nice if your work on this could be applied to standard Pd. Cheers, Iain
On Sun, 2012-04-01 at 20:11 -0400, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
Indeed, that is the most likely reason. If you have ability/willpower to try pd-l2ork version of hslider/vslider, this problem is solved in that any values that pass through the slider set to linearly scale between specific values remain unaltered (apart from outer edges of the slider). However, any values that result from moving the slider will be adjusted based on the slider's position in respect to the overall slider.
HTH
Ico
On 04/01/2012 07:35 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I think that's because it normalizes the values based on the pixel granularity of the slider. That's just a guess.
.hc
On Apr 1, 2012, at 7:14 AM, Iain Mott wrote:
Hi, I've noticed something strange with hslider and vslider. I you give them a large range, the inputs and outputs aren't always equal or at least they are out by a factor greater than 1. For example with the range 0 - 55000, if you connect a number object to hslider's input and enter 6034, the output reads 6032.68.
Couldn't find this reported elsewhere - though perhaps i didn't search hard enough. This result is on linux.
Cheers, i
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
"We have nothing to fear from love and commitment." - New York Senator Diane Savino, trying to convince the NY Senate to pass a gay marriage bill
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list