Did you really mean to reply in private ?
Nope!
Here it is!
Dammit again - I'm using the second core of the machine for the live score,
dynamic object creation in GEM - but I see the
new version of Inscore supports PD, so all my work over the last 6 months has
been for nothing. Pah!
Your tool surely has some advantages over Inscore.
It's in PD/GEM only. I sent the percussionist the score patch, with the external
in a folder called ext/. The object creation manager was loaded within the patch thus: [ext/gemnotes_counter] The point is - he doesn't know anything about programming PD or compiling software, and it ran straight away with Pd-extended straight from the emailed patch.
I suppose that's good, but I'm anxious now to sort out a 2D engine for PD. I'm using an industrial digger with GEM, when I should be using a spade! I'm not really a graphics programmer, (in fact I have no training as a programmer) so this is quite a challenge for me. PD was telling me that the CPU load was about 112% just for the score on my 2.2GHz dual core.
Or perhaps there's something out there that could be ported.
Ed
PS - I'm over it. If I wanted to be the first I should have learned how to program in 1997, not 2005!