Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hi,
list-abs
These are abstractions implementing common list operations. Included are in alphabetical order:
last-x.pd
get a list containing the last x atoms received.
seems like you are using "-" as separator between "list" and the function-name.
it would be very nice if this would be compatible with the "standard" list-objects. since there is no way to make an abstraction [list x] which behaves fundamentally different from [list y], i would suggest to alias the core functions to names without backslashes. (no matter whether the separator is "." or "-" or anything else _but_ space)
this way we could have a consistant(ly named) set of objects operating on lists, no matter whether they are built-ins, external C-objects or abstractions.
(what again was the reason to not do it like that in the first place??)
mfg.asd.r IOhannes