jared wrote:
I would recommend Bidule by Plogue. I love this program. Brilliant for live use as well. It has a basic midi sequencer that, from the sounds of it, might be sufficient for what the expressed need here. The next version will have more advanced sequencing capabilities. Most importantly it speaks OSC. It comes in at an extremely reasonable $75. The FFT processing tools are worth that price alone, imho. I highly recommend it.
Jared Dunne
Thank you Jared. But I can't even try it. I have just gnu/Linux here. And being also a programmer, I prefer to have the sources of the software I use (NOTE: somebody should invent an acronym for this explanation ;-) ).
It seems interesting, though.
Ciao,
c.
-----Original Message----- From: pd-list-bounces@iem.at [mailto:pd-list-bounces@iem.at] On Behalf Of Cesare Marilungo Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 2:10 AM To: Chris McCormick Cc: pd-list@iem.at Subject: Re: [PD] Midi sequencing
Chris McCormick wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 12:05:40AM +0000, Cesare Marilungo wrote:
I think it would be interesting to have some sort of OSC sequencer. I
would love to compose with the same control over each note (or any
other
kind of event) you can have with csound scores but that can be edited
visually.
I love to use pure data to build instruments and effect, but at some point I want to expose all the parameters of my patch to OSC and use such kind of tool (some kind of OSC sequencer) to concentrate on composition/performance, mostly drawing and editing envelopes and
maybe
also triggering them in a generative fashion.
Hi Cesare,
It's definately possible to draw and edit envelopes and trigger them
in
a generative fashion using the datastructures feature of Puredata. You might like to check out Hans' work "solitude" and also there are
various
GOP abstractions floating around which allow you to make/edit
envelopes
with a mouse and save those envelopes' states between sessions in various ways.
Yes. I knew about that and I've already experimented a bit with pd data structures and their graphical representation. But I was thinking about a more generic tool. Something to drive multiple sound generating softwares in the same session.
The approach of using pd for everything is worth when you plan to release a piece as a patch. But I'd like to have a dedicated application
with a more flexible gui to compose and control performances.
Ciao,
c.
Best,
Chris.
chris@mccormick.cx http://mccormick.cx