26 Aug
2005
26 Aug
'05
10:23 p.m.
Thanks Mathieu,
however, it is not that easy: no loops in my patches (I wouldn't have been able to substitute them by patch cords would I), but nonetheless delays between r~s.
That information is all before your eyes. Just follow your patch >backwards to see where the signal you are send~ing is coming from. If the object you're sending to is _also_ a place where the signal came from (i mean >any signal contributing to what you're send~ing), then you get a chicken-and-egg dependency. Pd then solves that problem by delaying the sent signal so that it only has an impact at the next "instant" in the future, that is, one block away.
--Matthias