Hallo, marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote:
sorry, I still don't know exactly what you mean. I think it is the only solution to keep libraries in subfolders if we want to solve nameclashes. but even if in subfolders, they should be accessible as list-abs and not list-abs/list-abs.
Huh? Nameclashes have nothing to do with subfolders per se. A nameclash is, when two objects have the same name registered in Pd but act differently. Folders are a way to organize files in a filesystem (harddisk).
the thing that I was complaining so loudly is that pd-extended ships all these libraries but does not add the paths.
Yes, that's exactly what I mean: Many people would like every objectclass to be global. OTOH many also want every object in CVS to be available in pd-extended. The net result then is a lot of nameclashes: You just cannot get zexy's urn and maxlib's urn loaded into the global namespace at the same time without a clash. (Actually you cannot even load them at the same time at all, IIR.)
Ciao
Frank Barknecht