On Sep 6, 2007, at 11:25 AM, Steffen wrote:
On 06/09/2007, at 10.54, JNM wrote:
ild0012 wrote:
why pdpedia is needed ?
As a primo-supporter of the idea in France, let me try to explain. There are main reasons: (snip)
There a a lot of good ideas there - agreed. Just got a^Htwo questions.
Why can't those issues be solved by using *-help.pd files (or allabout-*.pd files if needed be) as how the PDDP tried to do it? - As i see it, the only (but very likely very important) new this is the multilingual issue, which i don't see why couldn't be solved in .pd doman.
If the real problem is, that people (that write good documentation) can't be asked to submit edited versions of existing (or non existing) help files to the PDDP cvs folder, then maybe a easier way to submit would solve the problem?
Hopefully the pdpedia will spur the creation of better help patches.
I certainly hope the pdpedia does not replace the effort to make
better help patches, I don't think that's anyone's intention. The
core idea of the pdpedia is that it's a place where the community can
easily contribute.
Plus I think it will be very helpful to get the documentation
translated into other languages. Then we don't have to wait for
localized comment support.
.hc
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of
exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an
idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps
it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into
the possession of everyone, and the receiver cannot dispossess
himself of it. - Thomas Jefferson