Hallo, marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote:
there was a discussion 3 years ago about the inlet of loadbang. I see now that loadbang has lost its inlet, but actually it would be nice to have it back and to make it react to a bang message. 3 years ago frank and IOhannes said, they would vote for this feature too. I think this feature is helpful, when you edit a patch and want to retrigger the loadbang. I know that this can also be done by a message ;pd-patchname.pd loadbang but that is not so intuitive and also more time-consuming to write. and also for max compatibility...
Ah, does Max have an inlet in [loadbang]?
Anyway another workaround is to use an abstraction:
[inlet] | | [loadbang] |/ [outlet]
You could even put a [receive $1] inside.
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__