By the way,
I have
- Pd "vanilla" which I donwloaded as a .zip and manually uninstalled
into a folder without doing anything to "install" it; I run it by running the .exe file inside the bin folder 2) pd-extended which I downloaded as an executable installer and installed by executing the installer.
If I managed to get the registry settings working (which I have verified that are present in the registry), would then both pd's use them? If so, how can a pd-extended and a pd-vanilla coexist (and both work as expected) in the same machine?
Hans-Christoph Steiner escribió:
On Dec 24, 2009, at 11:04 AM, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner escribió:
Post the log from your Pd window.
You mean the messages that are printed at startup? There are only these ones:
[import] $Revision: 1.2 $ [import] is still in development, the interface could change! compiled against Pd version 0.41.4
Indeed, [import] does load, while it does not (obviously and expectedly) when I run pd-vanilla (I have a separate folder with pd-vanilla).
I have also deleted and re-installed pd extended, this time in c:\Progra Files\pd, while before it was installed in d:\programmi\pd_extended, but this has not changed anything (i didn't expect it to).
Your preferences aren't set to the default because its not trying to load the libraries. [import] is compiled into Pd-extended, that's why its loaded. The default prefs are included in that .reg file in Program Files\Pd. FYI, It doesn't need to be in English since it uses the %ProgramFiles% env var, which on Italian would be set to \programmi.
.hc
Looking at things from a more basic level, you can come up with a more direct solution... It may sound small in theory, but it in practice, it can change entire economies. - Amy Smith