Roman Haefeli a écrit :
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 20:10 +0100, cyrille henry wrote:
Roman Haefeli a écrit :
running fgl_glxgears gives me values between 440 and 450 frames per second, which makes me assume, that hardware accelerated opengl works on my computer.
you should have 10 time more with this card.
no, i don't think so. it makes a difference between running fgl_glxgears and the 'normal' glxgears, since the former is much more complex than the latter. also it depends on the window size you are rendering at (and if the window is (partially) hidden by another window etc.).
values on my computer (with original window size):
glxgears -printfps: ~2200 fgl_glxgears: ~450
ok, i did not know that fgl_glxgears was more complex than glxgears. this looks ok.
i know, that this is not a serious way of benchmarking, but at least these values make me believe, that hardware acceleration works. or am i wrong?
my glxgears -printfps gives me 60, but i have direct rendering! (rendering is sync to the screen flip)
your acceleration work because glxinfo | grep direct says: 'direct rendering: Yes'
cyrille
roman
___________________________________________________________ Der fr�he Vogel f�ngt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de