Pd-dev must be a quiet list indeed when even stuff like what to name future objects gets discussed here ;-)
D.
Matt Barber wrote:
Hallo, Miller Puckette hat gesagt: // Miller Puckette wrote:
Hmm, tabindex~ diesn't make it clear that stuff is actually going into the table.
With tabindex~ I also would assume, that I'm *getting* the value at a certain index position, tabread~ style.
vtabwrite~ sounds OK, as do tabpoke~ or tabput~ or tabwriteto~ ... ?
I think, vtabwrite~ maybe could be used to make a "v"-version of tabwrite~, by which I mean something, that acts correctly with clock-delayed messages as vsnapshot~, vline~ etc. do.
The "v" could also stand for "variable," as in [vd~]. Could you have [vtabwrite~] and [vtabwrite4~]? The interpolation scheme could get a little tricky... I think we discussed this a few months ago when someone asked for amounted to a variable [delwrite~] with interpolation.