13 Jan
2019
13 Jan
'19
1:56 a.m.
Em sex, 11 de jan de 2019 às 19:25, Alexandre Torres Porres < porres@gmail.com> escreveu:
So it seems this delay scheme needs to be revised, and maybe that's why the minimum window size of 64 gives us some weird artifacts!
Actually, based on another thread I opened here on the list, it seems the minimum hop size for an overlap needs to be 64, so [block~ 64 2] wouldn't really work... this means that starting with a window of 64 samples could raise issues, hence it might be the actual culprit!