23 Jan
2006
23 Jan
'06
3:14 p.m.
Le 23 Janvier 2006 08:52, Thomas Sivertsen a écrit :
Just because a few of the effects have been ported does not mean PiDiP is a port of effectv to PD. PiDiP contains a lot more than just some nifty effects.
Who started saying this thing about PiDiP being a port of effectv anyway? it needs to stop, right now.
What's the problem about porting and extending software, or using code from some other software to kickstart a more ambitious project? That's a very common practice with free software. Look at the changelog. -- Marc