30 Nov
2004
30 Nov
'04
12:01 a.m.
this one works really well with only about 4 ms measured latency at 64 samples hardware buffer.
although this is really good news i'm curious ... which sample rate have you been using? at 44100 and 2 * 64 samples it should only be 2.9 ms ... (2.6 with 48000) ... possibly we lose another 64 samples somewhere in the dsp tick (miller?)
There is a small problem just as before seemingly not related to the scheduler stuff (mainly after changing the hardware buffer size) which sounds like half-filled buffers. A new problem is the loss of adc input at some point. I'll report more detailed later on.
i'll check it later ...
--
mailto:TimBlechmann@gmx.de ICQ: 96771783
http://www.mokabar.tk
After one look at this planet any visitor from outer space
would say "I want to see the manager."
William S. Burroughs