8 Jun
2015
8 Jun
'15
11:10 a.m.
Hi,
On 07/06/2015 04:48, Max wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Merci Cyrille,
in the formula the intermediate steps are quite small fractions and it seems their precision is important. In the test case the Pd implementation is 8917.74 km off the proper result (2887.26). However I need a precision of about 1m.
So I assume the haversine formula is not implementable in Pd at all? (unless double precision will be there that is)
I had a go at immplementing it in Pd Vanilla, with a few [expr], and the result seems the one expected... no?
Lorenzo