On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Oops, there was supposed to be a second part to that, which is a question: So why couldn't meta-messages all be lists,
basically because it is like it is. i guess that if someone (not completely naive; and with an eye on language-design and not just tool-design) would go and re-invent the wheel, they would make lists just lists. without any special "selector" (just the first element of the list).
Ah, perhaps you, as the maintainer of GEM, could tell us how all those "open"/"set"/etc would be, if Pd were redesigned from scratch the way you'd enjoy. I'm certainly curious about it.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal, Québec