hi
i don't know to which mail you are answering, but i still believe, that pd's [metro] is absolute accurate (even sub-sample-accurate), when used in combination with [vline~] for example. the only case, where it could be considered inaccurate, is when cpu-load is too high, though when writing to a file, it is still accurate.
roman
On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 11:21 +1100, schiemer@uow.edu.au wrote:
If you're worried by metro's irregularity then you should use Eric Lyons' samm~ (sample accurate multiple metronomes). This is described in http://www.sarc.qub.ac.uk/~elyon/LyonPapers/SampleAccurate-Lyon-ICMC2006.pdf
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de