IOhannes m zmoelnig escribió:
no. it gives the warning with Pd>=0.42 and it doesn't give the error with older Pd-versions
Ouch, yes, I now realise I may have had different Pd versions (though not different gem versions) installed on the different machines.
as for worrying: Gem>=0.92 should work fine, even if you get these warnings.
Great. Just out of curiosity however, what do the warning mean? Well ok, they mean a class has been overridden, but "why"? The classes mentioned in the error messages (pix_videoDS for example) don't exist in Pd, so it seems like they are defined twice in Gem?
I just would like to understand roughly what's going on...
thanks m.