On Sep 23, 2009, at 4:22 PM, András Murányi wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Daniel Wilcox
danomatika@gmail.com wrote:---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: sergio basbaum sbasbaum@gmail.com To: Pierre pierre@314r.net, Pd-list@iem.at Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:01:01 -0300 Subject: Re: [PD] vanilla, extended, svn and x86_64 Hi all,
I'm new in this community. I helped a little bit to organize the
PDCon 09 in São Paulo, and Iḿ getting more involved with Pd since.This is just to say that I've installed 64bit Ubuntu two months ago,
because I have a 64 Turion Acer notebook.Nothing worked properly, so I've changed to 32bit version and
everything seems fine up to now. But the 64 version is very
unstable, and for my personal experience I really do not recommend...best for all
I'd second this experience. After spending about 2 weeks in Ubuntu
64 bit (which did seem faster) and wrangling with pd (http://puredata.info/docs/developer/BuildingPdExtended64bitUbuntuIntrepid ) I ended up reinstalling with 32 bit.I had some shows to get ready for and I just didn't have time to
debug 64 bit ...Interesting enough, I recently bought a macbook pro and pd-extended
seems to run fine in 10.6, although I'm sure it's running in 32 bit
compatibility mode.I'm on 64 bit Ubuntu and my Pd-extended is a 32 bit autobuild. Maybe
I needed 'getlibs' to make it work (don't remember exactly, but
don't worry getlibs is super easy.). It works fine, recommended to
64 bit fellows out there. Bottom line is that you don't need to go
back to 32 bit Linux to have 32 bit Pure Data! Building pd-extended for 64 bit never worked for me. Now here's my problem (I already brought it up): To get proper use
of the GUI rewrite I shall make/download a 32 bit build, so that it
can use the libraries from pd-extended. Unfortunately, I was unable
to make that 32 bit build. Any recommendations? Maybe a downloadable
32 bit .deb?
Post your build errors on pd-dev and we'll get you building.
.hc
http://at.or.at/hans/