It might work better to switch to a model of separately maintained libraries (as Joe Deken has suggested) - see the thread with subject line "Extending Vanilla [....]"
cheers Miller
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 07:19:50PM +0100, Fred Jan Kraan wrote:
On 2015-03-03 03:05 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Pd-extended is in need of a new maintainer. Obviously, I can't keep up these days. I'm happy to help anyone get up to speed.
I want to participate in the maintenance, but it is probably much more complex than fixing some minor issues in cyclone. Assuming more people are interested but in a similar situation, is there a way to split it up in more manageable pieces? It would be more of a community effort then, which is always preferable.
.hc
Fred Jan
On Dec 24, 2014, at 2:00 PM, João Pais wrote:
Hello list,
I wanted to ask, what is the current state of the pd-extended distribution? Pd-vanilla has had some regular updates recently (some of them with interesting developments), but the latest pd-ext version is still from almost 2 years ago.
Best,
jmmmp
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list