i'm not sure who the originator of them are, but the older pd/externals rpms over at Planet CCRMA work pretty well, and the srpms from those would be a good place to start with the .spec files i would think.
On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 06:42, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
That's why we are working on distros. The MacOS X .app is drap-n-drop.
The Debian packages work quite nicely. The Windows installer (though
a bit old), works after clicking Next, Next, Next... Finish. Then
those who want to can compile things. We do need people to join in
the active maintenance of more packages, like RPMs, for example..hc
On Oct 22, 2004, at 1:19 PM, altern wrote:
hi all
Just wanted to say few things about PD after having spent some days
failing to compile the externals under OSX. I have been sending emails
to the list askign for help as i was unable to do this. There were
some people giving me tips about makefiles etc... but still i havent
been able to do it, but i am getting closer :)I guess emails like this are everywhre in linux mailing lists but i
also think that they are necessary once in a while not to forget about
the issuet that worries me.i am able to program on python, javascript and some other scripting
languages, to patch on PD and MAX, and I have no problem using windows
- ok not very complex, but i mean i am used to deal with "mission
impossible" problems since windows has been in the past an endless
source of them -. I was using SuSE linux on my laptop and compiled PD
and some other applications, i configured my winmodem and took me two
days to find out. Now i want to install Ubuntu linux on my new
powerbook. I am not supertechnical person but i dont give up in 2 min
when i have a problemSo I was wondering what does happen with the people that have less
technical knowledge than me for example students (i teach sometimes
multimedia stuff) or musicians with no computing background. My bet is
that probably they would end up using MAX/MSP. I know many musicians
that love to use pd patches that they dont create themselves and they
dont know constructing anything on pd, if they have to spend more that
30 min on seting up the system they will drop PD to use another more
user friendly app like MAX. Some of you might say that then PD is not
for you, but i dont really think this should be this way. I think we
should work to develop a tool tht can be used by savy users but also
by non experience users (of course they would use it in a different
way), some people might want to create very new and complex stuff and
PD is great to do this, but some other may be would just like to use
that amazingly complex patch that the first person created.Once in a while some MAX user asks in the Pd list how to create an
exacutable of a PD patch, the answer is that you just distribute PD
together with the patch because its free open source. I think this is
very nice idea but if the patch this person is distributing uses an
external and somebody has to spend days searching and asking on
mailing lists how to change the makefile and stuff like this its
hardly of any use for loads of people.You all know this of course, this is a general problem in the linux
comunity. A musician friend of mine said me that he believes that
musicians using linux spend more time setting up the system than
actually working with it to make music. This is not true but in a way
it is not that wrong if i think about my last 2 weeks (i went crazy
too to set up python + all the libreries i need on my machine). This
opinion gives as well a flavor of his experiences with linux and open
source tools. We should work to change this opinion.If we really want to introduce all kinds of people to PD we should
find easier ways to set it up, for example the latest drag-and-drop
installation for mac its a good move as it is closer to the way mac
users think, despite that it is inconsistant or not from a technical
pint of view. The only reason for me to keep trying setting the
pd-externals up is that i really belive I must try as hard as possible
to use open source tools. But many others out there dont believe this.
They think open source is a nice idea but they want their work done
eficiently and fast.my 2 cents on this.
agur bat
--
enrike
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
Using ReBirth is like trying to play an 808 with a long stick. -David Zicarelli
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list